Coordinating Supplier Competition via Auctions
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper studies market schemes in which auctions are used to coordinate the buyer and competing suppliers in a procurement setting. While auction is typically considered a price-determination mechanism, it could also serve as a coordination mechanism. Possible auction and market mechanisms and their expected payoffs are analyzed in a two-supplier, one-buyer system. The auction mechanism could have a significant impact on the payoffs received by the players and on system efficiency. To establish basic insights, we first consider the case where the players have complete information on each others’ costs. This is followed by asymmetric information analysis where the players’ costs are private information while each supplier’s cost is known probabilistically. Channel coordination can be achieved with a two-part contract auction where the buyer announces a price-sensitive order function, and the suppliers compete in an ascending-bid side-payment auction. To achieve coordination, a thirdparty intermediary must prevent the buyer from manipulating the order function, thus truthfully transferring the market demand function to the suppliers. Insights from the analysis allow us to rank different market mechanisms by their impact on expected channel efficiency, and the expected payoffs for the buyer and the winning supplier. (
منابع مشابه
Coordination of competitive advertising via investing in transportation lead time reduction
In this study, a contract for vertical and horizontal coordination is developed in which transportation mode and carbon emissions tax play a key role in determining the values of the contract parameters. The contract is designed for simultaneous coordination of cooperative advertising and periodic review replenishment decisions of a supplier and two competitive retailers. To obtain the optimal ...
متن کاملSplit-award Auctions with Investment∗
This paper studies split-award procurement auctions where a buyer can either divide full production among multiple suppliers or award the entire production to a single supplier. The literature shows that single sourcing usually dominates multiple sourcing. This paper challenges the “winner-takes-all” argument. In a framework of generalized second-price auctions with pre-auction investment, we s...
متن کاملEffects of Information Disclosure under First- and Second-Price Auctions in a Supply Chain Setting
We study a supply chain where an upstream supplier auctions his inventory or capacity as a bundle. The importance of this setting is two-fold: From a practical point of view, there are several examples, specially in service industries (e.g., auctioning the capacity of a stadium to hold events, or auctioning the sponsorship of a website), where a supplier’s capacity is sold as a single piece; fr...
متن کاملThe Impact of Online, Reverse Auctions
Increasingly, buyers are turning to the use of online, reverse auctions in their negotiation activities with suppliers. How does the use of these price competition mechanisms impact buyer-supplier relationships? We consider this question in the context of a quasi-experiment involving six reverse auctions conducted in the supply base of a major industrial buyer. The results indicate that online,...
متن کاملEffects of Information Disclosure Under First- and Second-Price Auctions in a Supply Chain Setting
We consider a two-stage supply chain comprising two retailers and a single supplier. Each retailer receives a signal of the consumer demand, and bids for the capacity of the supplier. The supplier sells his capacity as a bundle, and announces the winner as well as the auction price. Both retailers can get additional units in a procurement market when the auction closes, and then engage in a Cou...
متن کامل